[rabbitmq-discuss] pika/puka

Michael Klishin mklishin at gopivotal.com
Thu Jan 2 19:58:48 GMT 2014

On 2 Jan 2014, at 19:52, bernhard <bs at bit-field.de> wrote:

> Did I explore pika not good enough (I read about the asynchronous parts,
> but as far, as I see, it is not, what I need)?

See tornado and asyncore adapters. There is no reason to work with the underlying socket
directly (if you do, you will end up reinventing half of the client).

You still can do anything you want with sockets that talk to external devices, etc, and are not
managed by Pika.



Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list