[rabbitmq-discuss] Failed to add an exchange via the web interface
tonygarnockjones at gmail.com
Fri Mar 23 15:26:35 GMT 2012
On 23 March 2012 06:44, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
> The way we handle this in Rabbit proper is to allow any number type for a
> number, any string type for a string. This also reduces hassle for people
> declaring things over AMQP. Tony - is there a reason not to do this?
That's the way the code already was. However, it was confusing two cases: a
missing "port" argument, and a "port" argument of non-numeric type. I've
just pushed a tweak to the error reporting that'll distinguish the two.
Lionel, please have another try with current master.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss