[rabbitmq-discuss] Failed to add an exchange via the web interface

Tony Garnock-Jones tonygarnockjones at gmail.com
Fri Mar 23 15:26:35 GMT 2012

On 23 March 2012 06:44, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:

> The way we handle this in Rabbit proper is to allow any number type for a
> number, any string type for a string. This also reduces hassle for people
> declaring things over AMQP. Tony - is there a reason not to do this?

That's the way the code already was. However, it was confusing two cases: a
missing "port" argument, and a "port" argument of non-numeric type. I've
just pushed a tweak to the error reporting that'll distinguish the two.

Lionel, please have another try with current master.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20120323/6a042fa8/attachment.htm>

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list