[rabbitmq-discuss] STOMP and anonymous queue deletions
matthias at lshift.net
Thu Feb 19 08:53:31 GMT 2009
Dan Di Spaltro wrote:
> There definitely was one consumer at one time which plucked a message
> of that queue,
Actually, a STOMP 'subscribe' will always result in a consumer being
Also note that auto_delete is the default.
Did you definitely close the connections on which the 'subscribe's were
issued? It might be worth first checking that there aren't any old
queues hanging around before you start your test, and then, after the
test, run netstat to determine whether there are still any connections
open to the stomp port.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss