[rabbitmq-discuss] Rejecting messages if incorrect build number

[Patrick Long]

That was exactly my intention :-)

We current have the build number in the Queue Name. I guess we are going to
have to stick with that.


On 21 March 2014 15:14, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:

> On 21/03/2014 2:58PM, Patrick Long wrote:
>
>> When it did not it the consumer could call Basic.Reject. Perhaps this is
>> not quite what the AMQP spec intended for the use of Basic.Reject but it
>> seems like a practical use.
>>
>> What do others think?
>>
>
> Seems perfectly reasonable as long as your intention is to discard v1
> messages rather than send them to v1 consumers.
>
> (The spec says "The client MUST NOT use [basic.reject] as a means of
> selecting messages to process" but I think they had the latter type of
> scenario in mind.)
>
> Cheers, Simon
>
> --
> Simon MacMullen
> RabbitMQ, Pivotal
>



-- 
Patrick Long - Munkiisoft Ltd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20140321/f73e9ce6/attachment.html>