[rabbitmq-discuss] Federation Upstream Set Policy

Dann dann.ormond at gmail.com
Wed Jan 22 14:47:41 GMT 2014

Thank you both Alvaro and Simon.  As was pointed out, I did have the
upstream / downstream backwards and I appreciate the correction there.
 Also, the ability to add an upstream to multiple upstream sets will work.

Thanks all!

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:

> On 21/01/14 23:28, Dann wrote:
>> I have a case where I need to federate an exchange to two different
>> upstreams.  The upstreams are part of different federation upstream
>> sets.  It is possible to define the policy to send to multiple upstream
>> sets without using the "all" upstream set?
> Alvaro already pointed out that you may have upstream / downstream the
> wrong way round. But no, it's not possible to define more than one upstream
> set for a policy. However, each upstream can be in as many upstream sets as
> you like.
> Cheers, Simon
> --
> Simon MacMullen
> RabbitMQ, Pivotal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20140122/002263b1/attachment.html>

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list