[rabbitmq-discuss] Auto-delete queues not compatible with basic.get (vs. basic.consume)?

[Matt Pietrek]

Thanks Matthias - You cleared up my point of confusion.

Specifically, that because messages are written to an exchange rather than
a queue, the publisher doesn't "touch" the queue.

This is an important but subtle point. I may have overlooked it, but I
don't recall it being highlighted anywhere in the docs.

Matt


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Matthias Radestock
<matthias at rabbitmq.com>wrote:

> On 23/05/13 21:57, Michael Klishin wrote:
>
>>
>> 2013/5/24 Matt Pietrek <mpietrek at skytap.com <mailto:mpietrek at skytap.com>>
>>
>>
>>     Another follow up question: What exactly is meant by "they can't be
>>     shared"? Is the exclusivity limited to reading, or does it encompass
>>     both reading and writing?
>>
>>
>> any operation on the queue
>>
>
> More specifically, any queue.* method in AMQP.
>
> Note that publishers never 'write' to queues but publish messages to
> exchanges. So they are not affected by a queue's exclusivity.
>
> Matthias.
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.**rabbitmq.com<rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com>
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**rabbitmq-discuss<https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130523/c17daaf1/attachment.htm>