[rabbitmq-discuss] After server notifies of canceled consume, it doesn't acknowledge a channel close

[Reverend Chip]

On 5/2/2013 11:07 PM, Michael Klishin wrote:
> 2013/5/3 Chip Salzenberg <rev.chip at gmail.com <mailto:rev.chip at gmail.com>>
>
>     Why should nonexistent queue at start be a channel exception, but
>     nonexistent queue later not be one?  Makes no sense to me.
>
>
> Because when you start consuming, you have a chance to recover from a
> queue that does not exist. When the queue is deleted
> later, you don't necessarily have an easy way to do so.

Hm.  Doesn't seem to make any sense to me, still.  It means you can't
have more than one consume safely on a given channel.  Goofy.  No
matter, still.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130505/f38c30af/attachment.htm>