<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/2/2013 11:07 PM, Michael Klishin
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAE3HoVRjjwkPUKFJGfdjnhQnPFCjLa=kuVONztfbvpxR-Oui8g@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div class="gmail_extra">2013/5/3 Chip Salzenberg <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:rev.chip@gmail.com"
target="_blank">rev.chip@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Why should nonexistent queue at start be a channel
exception, but nonexistent queue later not be one? Makes no
sense to me.</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
Because when you start consuming, you have a chance to recover
from a queue that does not exist. When the queue is deleted</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">later, you don't necessarily have an easy
way to do so.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Hm. Doesn't seem to make any sense to me, still. It means you
can't have more than one consume safely on a given channel. Goofy.
No matter, still.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>