[rabbitmq-discuss] After server notifies of canceled consume, it doesn't acknowledge a channel close

[Michael Klishin]

2013/5/3 Chip Salzenberg <rev.chip at gmail.com>

> Why should nonexistent queue at start be a channel exception, but
> nonexistent queue later not be one?  Makes no sense to me.


Because when you start consuming, you have a chance to recover from a queue
that does not exist. When the queue is deleted
later, you don't necessarily have an easy way to do so.
-- 
MK

http://github.com/michaelklishin
http://twitter.com/michaelklishin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130503/858ff0eb/attachment.htm>