[rabbitmq-discuss] Impact of Updating Queue Parameters on Queued Messages

[Richard Raseley]

Wow, that's egg on my face. Not sure how I missed that one.

Thanks for your replies.

Regards,

Richard
On Dec 18, 2013 2:10 AM, "Simon MacMullen" <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:

> On 17/12/2013 18:55, Richard Raseley wrote:
>
>> Follow-up question:
>>
>> There doesn't seem to be a lot in the policy documentation about the
>> available definitions for (specifically) the DLX policies. Am I correct
>> in assuming there is also a 'dead-letter-routing-key' definition that I
>> can use for the expected effect?
>>
>
> From http://www.rabbitmq.com/dlx.html:
>
> "Similarly, an explicit routing key can be specified by adding the key
> "dead-letter-routing-key" to the policy."
>
> So yes :-)
>
>  If yes, is it preferred that these be defined in the same policy or
>> separate policies with different priorities?
>>
>
> Only one policy can apply to any queue / exchange, so they need to be in
> the same one.
>
> Cheers, Simon
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20131218/413efd68/attachment.html>