[rabbitmq-discuss] Field Type 'A'

Laing, Michael P. Michael.Laing at nytimes.com
Tue Oct 16 16:17:37 BST 2012

Thanks! A small item, but it ricocheted into the development we had been
doing in nodejs, forcing fixes.

We're now migrating our core code to python, partially due to problems
with node-amqp, and have started contributing to pika, e.g. we added
Consumer Cancel Notifications.


On 10/16/12 7:52 AM, "Matthias Radestock" <matthias at rabbitmq.com> wrote:

>On 15/10/12 16:24, Laing, Michael P. wrote:
>> Then the table is misleading in my opinion, causing developers for
>> 'unsupported' clients to mistakenly implement the column in the table
>> think they are done. Not the desired outcome, and an understandable
>> oversight by the nodejs-amqp author, I think.
>> Plus the comment is ambiguous as it says that field-array type is
>> implemented but not which tag is used. It should also be placed in C
>> to make it clear that it goes with the table.
>> Or perhaps a RabbitMQ column separate from Qpid would make sense.
>Well, that entire section, as stated, is a copy of an email to the AMQP
>dev list. So we really shouldn't change it. But guess what, I just have :)

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list