[rabbitmq-discuss] Field Type 'A'

Tue Oct 16 12:52:29 BST 2012

Michael,

On 15/10/12 16:24, Laing, Michael P. wrote:
> Then the table is misleading in my opinion, causing developers for
> 'unsupported' clients to mistakenly implement the column in the table and
> think they are done. Not the desired outcome, and an understandable
> oversight by the nodejs-amqp author, I think.
>
> Plus the comment is ambiguous as it says that field-array type is
> implemented but not which tag is used. It should also be placed in C above
> to make it clear that it goes with the table.
>
> Or perhaps a RabbitMQ column separate from Qpid would make sense.

Well, that entire section, as stated, is a copy of an email to the AMQP 
dev list. So we really shouldn't change it. But guess what, I just have :)

Matthias.