[rabbitmq-discuss] Yet Another Custom Exchange

[Gavin M. Roy]

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Michael Klishin <
michael.s.klishin at gmail.com> wrote:

> My use case is this: when you have a bunch of producers and consumers, and
> routing doesn't work the way you want it to, this kind of exchange can help
> validate consumers first (supposedly carefully designed consumers log
> messages they don't know how to handle and possible log messages they did
> process).
>

It is an interesting exchange, but why would you not just bind those
consumers with a basic_consume on a "control" topic exchange that is
separated from the actual message flow?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20110510/75904375/attachment.htm>