<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Michael Klishin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:michael.s.klishin@gmail.com">michael.s.klishin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
My use case is this: when you have a bunch of producers and consumers, and routing doesn't work the way you want it to, this kind of exchange can help validate consumers first (supposedly carefully designed consumers log messages they don't know how to handle and possible log messages they did process).<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>It is an interesting exchange, but why would you not just bind those consumers with a basic_consume on a "control" topic exchange that is separated from the actual message flow?</div>
<div><br></div></div>