[rabbitmq-discuss] [PATCH] Add exclusive queue support to stomp adaptor

[Tony Garnock-Jones]

Hi Jeff,

Ah! I hadn't actually seen the patch, but I just went hunting through the
archives to find the root of this thread. Yep.

Steve, am I right in thinking your objections apply to the "exclusive"
argument to queue.declare, rather than that to basic.consume? It seems to
me that supporting "exclusive" for basic.consume would be a useful addition
to the STOMP adapter.

Regards,
  Tony


On 26 March 2012 11:39, Jeff <jeff at jefftrout.com> wrote:
>
> ...



> You're probably looking for the "exclusive" argument to *basic.consume*
> rather than queue.declare.
>
> Yep - that is what this patch does - it allows us to pass in the exclusive
> argument to basic.consume in the stomp wrapper (it was previous hardcoded
> to be false)
>

-- 
Tony Garnock-Jones
tonygarnockjones at gmail.com
http://homepages.kcbbs.gen.nz/tonyg/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20120326/3a3a0a30/attachment.htm>