[rabbitmq-discuss] [PATCH] Add exclusive queue support to stomp adaptor

[Steve Powell]

Yup, I missed that (I did say IDKE).  Thanks.

Steve Powell  (a happy bunny)
----------some more definitions from the SPD----------
chinchilla (n.) Cooling device for the lower jaw.
socialcast (n.) Someone to whom everyone is speaking but nobody likes.
literacy (n.) A textually transmitted disease usually contracted in childhood.

On 26 Mar 2012, at 17:26, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
> 
> Ah! I hadn't actually seen the patch, but I just went hunting through the archives to find the root of this thread. Yep.
> 
> Steve, am I right in thinking your objections apply to the "exclusive" argument to queue.declare, rather than that to basic.consume? It seems to me that supporting "exclusive" for basic.consume would be a useful addition to the STOMP adapter.
> 
> Regards,
>   Tony
> 
> 
> On 26 March 2012 11:39, Jeff <jeff at jefftrout.com> wrote: 
> ...  
>  
> > You're probably looking for the "exclusive" argument to *basic.consume* rather than queue.declare.
> 
> Yep - that is what this patch does - it allows us to pass in the exclusive argument to basic.consume in the stomp wrapper (it was previous hardcoded to be false)
>  
> -- 
> Tony Garnock-Jones
> tonygarnockjones at gmail.com
> http://homepages.kcbbs.gen.nz/tonyg/