Hi Jeff,<br><br>Ah! I hadn't actually seen the patch, but I just went hunting through the archives to find the root of this thread. Yep.<br><br>Steve, am I right in thinking your objections apply to the "exclusive" argument to queue.declare, rather than that to basic.consume? It seems to me that supporting "exclusive" for basic.consume would be a useful addition to the STOMP adapter.<br>
<br>Regards,<br> Tony<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 26 March 2012 11:39, Jeff <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jeff@jefftrout.com">jeff@jefftrout.com</a>></span> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
... </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
> You're probably looking for the "exclusive" argument to *basic.consume* rather than queue.declare.<br>
<br>
Yep - that is what this patch does - it allows us to pass in the exclusive argument to basic.consume in the stomp wrapper (it was previous hardcoded to be false)<br></blockquote><div> </div></div>-- <br>Tony Garnock-Jones<br>
<a href="mailto:tonygarnockjones@gmail.com" target="_blank">tonygarnockjones@gmail.com</a><br><a href="http://homepages.kcbbs.gen.nz/tonyg/" target="_blank">http://homepages.kcbbs.gen.nz/tonyg/</a><br>