[rabbitmq-discuss] Cluster Memory Usage

[Matthias Radestock]

Cameron,

On 23/11/11 15:51, Cameron Davison wrote:
> I see, that is rather small. When you say QA is ongoing do you mean
> that y'all are always QAing things and that this fix has been QA'd, or
> do you mean that the QA for this is still going on and has not yet
> finished?

The latter.

> Would it be safe to make that change to the 2.6.1 codebase recompile
> it and start running with that patch?

It's difficult to see how the patch could break anything more than 
already is.

We haven't checked whether the patch is suitable for 2.6.1. It probably is.

Btw, what's stopping you from upgrading to 2.7.0?


Matthias.