[rabbitmq-discuss] Cluster Memory Usage

[Cameron Davison]

I see, that is rather small. When you say QA is ongoing do you mean
that y'all are always QAing things and that this fix has been QA'd, or
do you mean that the QA for this is still going on and has not yet
finished?

Would it be safe to make that change to the 2.6.1 codebase recompile
it and start running with that patch?

Thanks,
Cameron

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
> On 23/11/11 04:37, Cameron Davison wrote:
>>
>> Ideally we could get only the diff of the fix to 2.6.1
>
> QA is ongoing, however it looks like the diff is rather small:
>
> http://hg.rabbitmq.com/rabbitmq-server/rev/89315378597d
>
> The only other workarounds would be to turn off either persistence or
> confirms - which I imagine you might be rather reluctant to do.
>
> Cheers, Simon
>
> --
> Simon MacMullen
> RabbitMQ, VMware
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>