[rabbitmq-discuss] Active/Active failover and lost messages

Matthew Sackman matthew at rabbitmq.com
Mon Nov 7 23:12:43 GMT 2011

Hi Konstantin,

On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:22:57AM -0800, Konstantin Kalin wrote:
> You are right. That's the case. Once I returned back "Publisher
> confirms" no more messages are lost in this situation as well. ( I
> commented code when I was playing with different options and forgot to
> return back). Now RabbitMQ just works :)

That's good to hear. And slightly rare to hear around here ;)

> I also noticed that "Publisher confirms" increases CPU load on the
> cluster but I think this is expected costs.

Yes, it is expected. There is rather a lot more work going on per


More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list