[rabbitmq-discuss] Preventing Publisher from Consuming Own Messages?

[Randall Richard]

Is this behavior supported via the Channel.basicConsume() noLocal flag? When
looking at the description of no-local at:
http://www.rabbitmq.com/amqp-0-9-1-reference.html#domains, the description
is:

If the no-local field is set the server will not send messages to the
connection that published them.

Although when setting to true as a test, it did not seem to take affect.
 Any clarification will be appreciated.

Thanks,

-Randall
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20110418/e2c5c829/attachment.htm>