[rabbitmq-discuss] Preventing Publisher from Consuming Own Messages?

Matthew Sackman matthew at rabbitmq.com
Tue Apr 19 11:47:04 BST 2011

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 01:22:14PM -0400, Randall Richard wrote:
> Is this behavior supported via the Channel.basicConsume() noLocal flag? When
> looking at the description of no-local at:
> http://www.rabbitmq.com/amqp-0-9-1-reference.html#domains, the description
> is:
> If the no-local field is set the server will not send messages to the
> connection that published them.
> Although when setting to true as a test, it did not seem to take affect.
>  Any clarification will be appreciated.

Correct, we don't implement no-local.


More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list