[rabbitmq-discuss] Preventing Publisher from Consuming Own Messages?

[Matthew Sackman]

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 01:22:14PM -0400, Randall Richard wrote:
> Is this behavior supported via the Channel.basicConsume() noLocal flag? When
> looking at the description of no-local at:
> http://www.rabbitmq.com/amqp-0-9-1-reference.html#domains, the description
> is:
> 
> If the no-local field is set the server will not send messages to the
> connection that published them.
> 
> Although when setting to true as a test, it did not seem to take affect.
>  Any clarification will be appreciated.

Correct, we don't implement no-local.

Matthew