[rabbitmq-discuss] Crash reports for bug21673 branch
scott w
scottblanc at gmail.com
Wed Mar 3 16:30:05 GMT 2010
Ah ok great to know. Thanks Matthias!
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Matthias Radestock <matthias at lshift.net>wrote:
> Scott,
>
>
> scott w wrote:
>
>> The whole file is hundreds of MB. I've attached a gzipped copy of the
>> first 10K lines of output from rabbit-sasl.log. The rabbit.log file doesn't
>> have anything interesting, just info level messages about connections being
>> established.
>>
>> I'm not forwarding to the main list since I don't want to send 66K of data
>> to everyone.
>>
>> Also to answer Matthew's question about which version I am using, here is
>> what "hg summary" reports:
>>
>> parent: 2781:9e0c76ab1039 tip
>> merge default ⇨ bug 21673
>> branch: bug21673
>> commit: 182 unknown (clean)
>> update: (current)
>>
>> Any feedback would be helpful.
>>
>
> The first entry in the sasl log does indeed point to the problem:
>
> =CRASH REPORT==== 27-Feb-2010::22:18:11 ===
> crasher:
> initial call: gen:init_it/7
> pid: <0.194.0>
> registered_name: rabbit_msg_store_gc
> exception exit: {unhandled_info,
> {file_handle_cache,maximum_eldest_since_use,
> 1586.6666666666667}}
>
> in function gen_server2:terminate/6
> ancestors: [rabbit_msg_store,rabbit_sup,<0.76.0>]
> messages: []
> links: [<0.193.0>]
>
> dictionary: [{fhc_age_tree,{0,nil}}]
> trap_exit: false
> status: running
> heap_size: 10946
> stack_size: 24
> reductions: 42501230341
> neighbours:
>
> The bug that causes this got fixed on 18-Feb, whereas the version you are
> running is two days older. So updating your checkout to the latest version
> will give you happier rabbit.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20100303/e8d1b52d/attachment.htm
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss
mailing list