[rabbitmq-discuss] rabbitmq with one producer no consumer

[Ben Standefer]

Is the "new persister" a replacement for using Mnesia to make RabbitMQ more
durable?  We've had issues moving the Mnesia database between machines,
requiring us to make questionable binary edits of schema.DAT.  One of our
main frustrations with RabbitMQ is how it handles durability, recovery, and
failure, so it'd be awesome to see improvement in this area soon.  Thanks!

-Ben Standefer


On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Matthew Sackman <matthew at rabbitmq.com>wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:10:56PM +0300, Ovidiu Deac wrote:
> > 1. How stable is the new persister?
>
> Many people are using it. It's just finishing going through QA -
> something I personally doubted would ever happen...
>
> > 2. How can I try it?
>
> Compile from source - see http://www.rabbitmq.com/build-server.html but
> before the "make" step, add in "hg up -C bug21673"
>
> > 3. When is it expected to be released?
>
> "Very soon" - it /should/ be in the next release.
>
> Matthew
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20100719/2fee830f/attachment.htm>