Is the "new persister" a replacement for using Mnesia to make RabbitMQ more durable? We've had issues moving the Mnesia database between machines, requiring us to make questionable binary edits of schema.DAT. One of our main frustrations with RabbitMQ is how it handles durability, recovery, and failure, so it'd be awesome to see improvement in this area soon. Thanks!<div>
<br></div><div>-Ben Standefer</div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Matthew Sackman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matthew@rabbitmq.com">matthew@rabbitmq.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:10:56PM +0300, Ovidiu Deac wrote:<br>
> 1. How stable is the new persister?<br>
<br>
</div>Many people are using it. It's just finishing going through QA -<br>
something I personally doubted would ever happen...<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> 2. How can I try it?<br>
<br>
</div>Compile from source - see <a href="http://www.rabbitmq.com/build-server.html" target="_blank">http://www.rabbitmq.com/build-server.html</a> but<br>
before the "make" step, add in "hg up -C bug21673"<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> 3. When is it expected to be released?<br>
<br>
</div>"Very soon" - it /should/ be in the next release.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
Matthew<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com">rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>