Is the "new persister" a replacement for using Mnesia to make RabbitMQ more durable? �We've had issues moving the Mnesia database between machines, requiring us to make questionable binary edits of schema.DAT. �One of our main frustrations with RabbitMQ is how it handles durability, recovery, and failure, so it'd be awesome to see improvement in this area soon. �Thanks!<div>
<br></div><div>-Ben Standefer</div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Matthew Sackman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matthew@rabbitmq.com">matthew@rabbitmq.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:10:56PM +0300, Ovidiu Deac wrote:<br>
> 1. How stable is the new persister?<br>
<br>
</div>Many people are using it. It's just finishing going through QA -<br>
something I personally doubted would ever happen...<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> 2. How can I try it?<br>
<br>
</div>Compile from source - see <a href="http://www.rabbitmq.com/build-server.html" target="_blank">http://www.rabbitmq.com/build-server.html</a> but<br>
before the "make" step, add in "hg up -C bug21673"<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> 3. When is it expected to be released?<br>
<br>
</div>"Very soon" - it /should/ be in the next release.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
Matthew<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com">rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>