[rabbitmq-discuss] Is there more infos about AMQP 1.0 and rabbitmq roadmap towards it?

Thu Feb 4 02:11:33 GMT 2010

thank a lot.
I have read the PMC of 03,Feb
(http://www.amqp.org/confluence/display/AMQP/PMC+Minutes+for+2010-02-03),
things just as you mentioned.
It sames that in two time points ( End of Feb and May ) progress would
be happen.

2010/2/3 Alexis Richardson <alexis.richardson at gmail.com>:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:57 AM, techabc <techabc at gmail.com> wrote:
>> AMQP 1.0 reached PR 2 stage, and what plans after that?
>
> The plan is to develop 1.0 to a "recommended" or "Commitee Draft"
> spec, after which full AMQP 1.0 broker implementations should be
> developed.  When two independent, proven conformant and interoperable
> broker implementations exist, then 1.0 can be declared "final".
> Changes *may* occur between "Commitee Draft" and "final" but they
> should be *minor*.
>
> See: http://www.amqp.org/confluence/display/AMQP/AMQP1.0+SIG
>
>
>> When final release?
>
> We hope all the spec releases can be in 2010.  Obviously "final" is
> contingent on seeing proven broker interop and conformance.  We
> wouldn't want to rush that and mess it up.  So that may be a practical
> factor in slowing things down.  But, in my personal view, the major
> spec to keep an eye on is the *next* release aka "Commitee Draft".
>
>
>> According to the amqp bussiness requrement, must be 1.0 final after a
>> few implementations finished
>
> Yes.  To be precise: "The Committee Draft will only be promoted to
> AMQP 1.0 Final once two materially independent implementations have
> been developed and demonstrated to interoperate."
>
>
>> rabbitmq ready for it?
>
> We are at least as ready as anyone else is.
>
> alexis
>
>
>
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>> http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>>
>