[rabbitmq-discuss] Is there more infos about AMQP 1.0 and rabbitmq roadmap towards it?

[Alexis Richardson]

Hi

The PMC minutes on the amqp.org are notes of the weekly AMQP Working
Group meeting, which took place yesterday after my last email to you.
So, yes, they do indeed say that!  But, please note that these
deadlines are subject to an ongoing conversation between the AMQP
Members.  Keep an eye on the web site for further information.  Our
current hope is that we can promote the 1.0 spec draft from PR2 status
to 'recommended' quite soon, allowing time for serious implementation
work in 2010.

Cheers

alexis


On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:11 AM, techabc <techabc at gmail.com> wrote:
> thank a lot.
> I have read the PMC of 03,Feb
> (http://www.amqp.org/confluence/display/AMQP/PMC+Minutes+for+2010-02-03),
> things just as you mentioned.
> It sames that in two time points ( End of Feb and May ) progress would
> be happen.
>
> 2010/2/3 Alexis Richardson <alexis.richardson at gmail.com>:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:57 AM, techabc <techabc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> AMQP 1.0 reached PR 2 stage, and what plans after that?
>>
>> The plan is to develop 1.0 to a "recommended" or "Commitee Draft"
>> spec, after which full AMQP 1.0 broker implementations should be
>> developed.  When two independent, proven conformant and interoperable
>> broker implementations exist, then 1.0 can be declared "final".
>> Changes *may* occur between "Commitee Draft" and "final" but they
>> should be *minor*.
>>
>> See: http://www.amqp.org/confluence/display/AMQP/AMQP1.0+SIG
>>
>>
>>> When final release?
>>
>> We hope all the spec releases can be in 2010.  Obviously "final" is
>> contingent on seeing proven broker interop and conformance.  We
>> wouldn't want to rush that and mess it up.  So that may be a practical
>> factor in slowing things down.  But, in my personal view, the major
>> spec to keep an eye on is the *next* release aka "Commitee Draft".
>>
>>
>>> According to the amqp bussiness requrement, must be 1.0 final after a
>>> few implementations finished
>>
>> Yes.  To be precise: "The Committee Draft will only be promoted to
>> AMQP 1.0 Final once two materially independent implementations have
>> been developed and demonstrated to interoperate."
>>
>>
>>> rabbitmq ready for it?
>>
>> We are at least as ready as anyone else is.
>>
>> alexis
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> best regards,
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>>> http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>