[rabbitmq-discuss] STOMP and anonymous queue deletions
tonyg at lshift.net
Sat Feb 21 12:45:32 GMT 2009
Dan Di Spaltro wrote:
> We were definitely starting things in the wrong order, leading to
> that race condition. Since we can't declare exchanges in STOMP and
> whatnot (which is fine, since we use STOMP only in JS). Thanks for
> addressing the problem!
Glad it worked for you. Have you thought about what might be a STOMPish
way of declaring exchanges?
BTW, the current rabbitmq-http2 code uses plain-old JSON-RPC/HTTP to
expose a full(ish) suite of AMQP operations. Perhaps Orbited has a
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss