[rabbitmq-discuss] Cluster Pathology

Jason J. W. Williams jasonjwwilliams at gmail.com
Tue Feb 17 18:14:42 GMT 2009

Hey Tony

> Agreed. Our current clustering is really pretty lame as regards queues.
> Exchanges are fine, being stateless, but clustered queues Need Work.
> Which, incidentally, is next on my plate. I'll be looking at pluggable
> queues, distributed queues, and fixing the persister, since they all
> affect the same little areas of code.

That's pretty exciting. :-) What would be the difference between a
pluggable and distributed queue?

I owe Alexis a write-up on our use case and will get that to him this week.


More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list