[rabbitmq-discuss] STOMP Frame

[Tony Garnock-Jones]

Dan Di Spaltro wrote:
> I noticed that at the end of the STOMP frame you only have a null
> character when the reference implementation looks to have a null
> followed by a \n character.  Am I misinterpreting this, because the
> documentation doesn't seem to say anything about a null followed by a
> return.  Is this an issue for anyone else?

IMO the wording in the protocol spec http://stomp.codehaus.org/Protocol
could be tightened, but implies that a newline after the nul is an
error. And personally, I think a newline after a nul is nonsensical and
should be an error.

I don't know how to fix this properly: ignore the spec, and supply a
newline? Try to get the other implementations changed? Get the spec changed?

Tony
-- 
 [][][] Tony Garnock-Jones     | Mob: +44 (0)7905 974 211
   [][] LShift Ltd             | Tel: +44 (0)20 7729 7060
 []  [] http://www.lshift.net/ | Email: tonyg at lshift.net