[rabbitmq-discuss] basic.reject

[Ben Hood]

Jason,

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Jason J. W. Williams
<jasonjwwilliams at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Btw, the reason we haven't implemented basic.reject yet is the following
>> part of its specification: "The server MUST NOT deliver the message to the
>> same client within the context of the current channel." That requires a
>> whole bunch of extra book keeping and logic.

I don't think it's particularly difficult to get right, it's just that
it requires a bit of work, would put extra load on the broker and not
that many people have asked for it, as yet. This situation may change
though.

HTH,

Ben