[rabbitmq-discuss] only ram nodes cluster

[Alvaro Videla]

Hi,

disc node vs. ram node has nothing to do with message durability. This is
related to how Mnesia will store its data, but RabbitMQ doesn't uses Mnesia
to store messages. Mnesia is only used for storing things like exchange
metadata, routing information, queue metadata, and so on.

Cheers,

Alvaro


On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:56 AM, inbal doron <doroninbal1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I know there are prevoius messages regarding this topic but I believe
> there were changes in the matter.
>
> I am interesting in creating a cluster with 2 nodes that both are disc
> nodes.
> We have no durability needs and interested in a cluster for failover
> reasons.
>
> From previous messages I understand this is not recommended but could be
> done by creating the cluster with a disc node and reseting it to create ram
> only.
>
> I tried to do that but got an error message that the node can not be reset
> since it is the last disc node in the cluster. This is why I thought there
> might have been a change in the matter.
>
> Is there a way to create such a cluster?
> And if so, is it still not recommended for the needs I specified before?
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> Inbal
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20140515/3bbdbd8d/attachment.html>