[rabbitmq-discuss] Queue Failover and restore

[Arun Rao]

I am under the impression I get more throughput having 16 queues living on
4 different nodes compared to 16 queues living on 3 nodes. This difference
becomes noticeable when the number of messages ready picked up are
significantly higher? This actually goes back to making queues local and
providing more hardware. Am i mistaken?


On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Michael Klishin <mklishin at gopivotal.com>wrote:

> On 25 March 2014 at 09:59:06, Arun Rao (arunrao.seattle at gmail.com) wrote:
> > > I have 4 nodes with 4 queues on each node. HA policy is set to exactly
> > 2 nodes, so I have exactly one mirror.
> >
> > When a node fails, 4 queues on this node get distributed to the
> > other 3 nodes.
> >
> > After I bring the failed node backup, this failed node now only
> > has mirrors and no queues now live on this failed node. How can
> > I push queues to this failed node without deleting the queue and
> > recreating it?
> >
> > Even after restarting the entire cluster, I dont seem to get my
> > original setup back.
>
> You can't . Why do you need the queues to be on a specific node?
> --
> MK
>
> Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20140324/c0974a8e/attachment.html>