[rabbitmq-discuss] High Scalability and High Availability...How to?!!
Shadi Mari
shadimari at gmail.com
Sun Jun 15 14:13:32 BST 2014
Sounds great!
One more thing i was not lucky enough to find is to explore various
performance benchmarks were done against several rabbitmq deployments that
will me to size a rabbitmq solution.
For instance what would require to achieve 15K+ msgs/second? given that i
have multiple publishers and consumers on the same queue and the queue
content is draining (i.e.. no accumulation)? do i need to have an SSD to
increase throughput or SATA will be enough?
Thanks
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Michael Klishin <mklishin at gopivotal.com>
wrote:
>
> On 15 June 2014 at 12:13:28, Shadi Mari (shadimari at gmail.com) wrote:
> > > Let's say i have two nodes N1 and N2, and one Queue that is mirrored,
> > the master and slave reside on N1 and N2 respectively; in such
> > a case and as based on what you have advised, there is no way to
> distribute
> > consumers and publishers load across two nodes because the same
> > work will be done by the two nodes; thus to rectify, load distribution
> > manifests itself when we have two or more mirrored queues distributes
> > across 3 or more machines...
> >
> > Is my assumption correct?
>
> It is. A single giant queue is problematic in other ways, too, so avoid
> this
> scenario.
> --
> MK
>
> Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20140615/ec6fbd67/attachment.html>
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss
mailing list