[rabbitmq-discuss] [rabbitmq-stomp] Is the use of receipt header for SUBSCRIBE still recommended?
michael.justin at gmx.net
Sun Jan 26 09:53:37 GMT 2014
On 24.01.2014 12:52, Emile Joubert wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> On 24/01/14 11:18, Michael Justin wrote:
>> Has there been a change in the RabbitMQ STOMP plug-in since, which makes
>> this workaround obsolete, or is it still recommended to use a receipt?
> There have been numerous improvements to the STOMP adapter since v2.4.0,
> but SUBSCRIBE remains an asynchronous operation. As Rob suggested,
> requiring a receipt makes it a synchronous operation. If your
> application requires confirmation that the subscription is in place then
> you need the synchronous version.
thank you for the information! The synchronous solution using a receipt
header works very well, good to know that it is unchanged, so my app
(client library) docs are still valid and up-to-date.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss