[rabbitmq-discuss] Alternative to "immediate" in RabbitMQ 3.x
matthias at rabbitmq.com
Tue Oct 22 09:14:48 BST 2013
On 21/10/13 22:19, Chris wrote:
> It's a little more than presence. It is not enough to know the service
> is running-- I need to know if it can handle a message right now. So I
> guess I would need to use a solution to keep track not only of presence
> but of capacity-- which might be hard to do in a transactional manner.
> Still-- your point is taken and may be the best solution given the
> requirements and capabilities.
I actually think the two-queues solution you proposed would work well.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss