[rabbitmq-discuss] Alternative to "immediate" in RabbitMQ 3.x

Chris stuff at moesel.net
Mon Oct 21 22:19:48 BST 2013

Hi Michael,

It's a little more than presence.  It is not enough to know the service is
running-- I need to know if it can handle a message right now.  So I guess
I would need to use a solution to keep track not only of presence but of
capacity-- which might be hard to do in a transactional manner.

Still-- your point is taken and may be the best solution given the
requirements and capabilities.


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Michael Klishin <mklishin at gopivotal.com>wrote:

> On 21 Oct 2013, at 23:52, Chris <stuff at moesel.net> wrote:
> > Question #1: Is there some other way of doing it that I'm not thinking
> of?
> This is basically a presence problem. I'd recommend using a coordination
> service such as etcd or ZooKeeper, or at least a K/V store like Redis, when
> you need presence or coordination between publishers and consumers.
> MK
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20131021/35bd65ae/attachment.htm>

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list