[rabbitmq-discuss] Question regarding setting up a shovel between two clusters

Mon Oct 7 11:33:26 BST 2013

Well, your initial question was really about the differences between 
transient unmirrored / durable unmirrored / durable mirrored queues. And 
federation won't change any of those characteristics. (It uses queues to 
buffer messages upstream).

Cheers, Simon

On 04/10/2013 5:53PM, ron.jaeger at thomsonreuters.com wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> Thanks for the reply.  My apologies, but I missed your initial reply.  After reviewing your reply, I am curious if using federation rather than shoveling would be advantageous in this use case?
>
> Ron Jaeger
> PSTS Middleware CPS
> Thomson Reuters
> email: Ron.Jaeger at thomsonreuters.com
> phone: (651) 848-5264
> Cell: (651) 236-7233
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon MacMullen [mailto:simon at rabbitmq.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 11:32 AM
> To: Discussions about RabbitMQ
> Cc: Jaeger, Ron (TR Technology)
> Subject: Re: [rabbitmq-discuss] Question regarding setting up a shovel between two clusters
>
> On 04/10/2013 5:23PM, ron.jaeger at thomsonreuters.com wrote:
>> I am looking for a little help setting up a shovel between two
>> rabbitmq clusters.
>
> Hi. Did you see my answer here:
>
> http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/2013-October/030674.html
>
> ?
>
> Cheers, Simon
>
> --
> Simon MacMullen
> RabbitMQ, Pivotal
>

-- 
Simon MacMullen
RabbitMQ, Pivotal