[rabbitmq-discuss] Question regarding setting up a shovel within a cluster

[Simon MacMullen]

On 03/10/2013 10:40PM, ron.jaeger at thomsonreuters.com wrote:
> It is evident that it can’t access the queue because it was on the other
> cluster member that is  down.

Yes.

> I have considered having the queues be
> transient, but there are additional risks associated with that, such as
> loosing messages during a node failure.  I have also thought about
> mirroring the queues, but additional overhead may be a concern due to
> the high volume of traffic. Any thoughts or suggestions would be
> appreciated.

Well, those are the options you have. Either you care about the messages 
in the queue being available at all times, in which case you need 
mirroring, or you care about them surviving restarts but not node 
failures, in which case you need a durable unmirrored queue, or you 
don't care at all, in which case you can use a transient queue.

I'm not sure what other options could exist?

Cheers, Simon

-- 
Simon MacMullen
RabbitMQ, Pivotal