[rabbitmq-discuss] Question regarding setting up a shovel within a cluster
simon at rabbitmq.com
Fri Oct 4 10:25:48 BST 2013
On 03/10/2013 10:40PM, ron.jaeger at thomsonreuters.com wrote:
> It is evident that it can’t access the queue because it was on the other
> cluster member that is down.
> I have considered having the queues be
> transient, but there are additional risks associated with that, such as
> loosing messages during a node failure. I have also thought about
> mirroring the queues, but additional overhead may be a concern due to
> the high volume of traffic. Any thoughts or suggestions would be
Well, those are the options you have. Either you care about the messages
in the queue being available at all times, in which case you need
mirroring, or you care about them surviving restarts but not node
failures, in which case you need a durable unmirrored queue, or you
don't care at all, in which case you can use a transient queue.
I'm not sure what other options could exist?
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss