[rabbitmq-discuss] Dead-Lettering Performance
emile at rabbitmq.com
Thu Mar 21 12:19:03 GMT 2013
On 20/03/13 15:11, Maciej Lopacinski wrote:
> My question:
> - is it valid use of message expiration time?
It is valid to use TTL to implement delayed delivery. Whether it will
meet your expectations in this case is hard to say. If a message (to be
delayed by 110s) is published before another message (to be delayed by
10s) to the same queue then they will be expired almost simultaneously
> - are there any caveats around dead-lettering performance?
Dead-lettering a large number of messages could cause a spike in memory use.
> - are there any guarantees around dead-lettering performance?
I'm not sure what kind of guarantee you require. The possible memory
spike will be fixed in a future release.
> - does dead-lettering has same "priority" as others "internal
> operations" in RabbitMQ broker?
The Erlang scheduler treats processes performing dead-lettering the same
as all the other broker processes.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss