[rabbitmq-discuss] Scaling Throughput with Highly Available Queues

Richard Raseley richard at raseley.com
Tue Mar 19 21:16:53 GMT 2013


Sorry, I meant to say the master queue process. Can you comment on my
previous question assuming that correction?



On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Matthias Radestock
<matthias at rabbitmq.com>wrote:

> On 19/03/13 20:56, Richard Raseley wrote:
>> Thank you for your quick response. With regard to your suggestion on
>> using a specific replica count via the "exactly" ha-mode - wouldn't
>> there still be a bottleneck in the master node of the cluster? My
>> understanding is that it has a hand in all operations (obviously true in
>> a cluster with ha queues), but that it is in-line with all
>> non-publishing operation. Is this a correct understanding?
> There's no such thing as a master node for a *cluster*. There is for
> individual queues. Different queues can have their masters on different
> nodes.
> Matthias.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130319/04f7f7af/attachment.htm>

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list