[rabbitmq-discuss] Question on throughput with RabbitMQ-3.1.1

[Priyanki Vashi]

Hi ,

By mistake I had attached a wrong producer in my previous  zip file so
attaching the correct one now.
Sorry for that but I have so many different files, which I have tried.

So resending the zip files again with correct producer and consumer (I
believe)

//P




On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Emile Joubert <emile at rabbitmq.com> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> On 25/06/13 13:38, Priyanki Vashi wrote:
>
> > I have very high end server with 20 CPUs and 120 GB of RAM so I think
> > resources wise it's not the bottleneck.
>
> And what about the network speed? I would still try an independent
> bandwidth test from network to disk to give you a comparison reference.
>
> The numbers you quoted are about 2 orders of magnitude lower than I
> would expect for that hardware. Bear in mind that the queue process is
> typically the most CPU-intensive process. A queue on a single server can
> occupy at most one CPU, so will benefit more from a faster CPU than from
> many CPUs.
>
> > Did u and Tim received my scripts ?
>
> Not yet, but hopefully someone who knows more about the Pika client than
> me will be able to comment.
>
> > I learnt that basic_consume is better choice than basic_get since server
> > will directly send messages to listening consumer without consumer
> > polling it.
>
> Yes, and the asynchronous choice is typically faster.
>
>
> If you are still stuck with very low throughput then I would recommend
> you try the MulticastMain utility, included in the RabbitMQ Java client.
> It includes support for many of the options that you want to compare,
>
>
>
> -Emile
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130625/f1e850ae/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Producer_Consumer_Scripts_latest.zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 6584 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130625/f1e850ae/attachment.zip>