[rabbitmq-discuss] Causing publisher confirmations nacks for testing?

[Tim Watson]

On 20 Jun 2013, at 10:28, Tim Watson wrote:
> Would the broker not send basic.nack on a channel in confirm mode if the message was un-routable?
> 

Oh please ignore me, that's not the case!

Tim

> On 20 Jun 2013, at 10:14, Emile Joubert wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On 19/06/13 19:30, Ty Sarna wrote:
>>> I'm working with publisher confirmations, and I'd like to verify that my
>>> nack-handling logic is correct. Is there some way I can make RabbitMQ
>>> nack on demand, for testing purposes?
>> 
>> No, I don't think there is a simple way of prompting the broker to send
>> a basic.nack. But there is very little value in handling basic.nack
>> specially because the integrity of a broker that ever did send a
>> basic.nack would probably be compromised.
>> 
>> 
>> -Emile
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss