[rabbitmq-discuss] Causing publisher confirmations nacks for testing?

[Tim Watson]

Would the broker not send basic.nack on a channel in confirm mode if the message was un-routable?

On 20 Jun 2013, at 10:14, Emile Joubert wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 19/06/13 19:30, Ty Sarna wrote:
>> I'm working with publisher confirmations, and I'd like to verify that my
>> nack-handling logic is correct. Is there some way I can make RabbitMQ
>> nack on demand, for testing purposes?
> 
> No, I don't think there is a simple way of prompting the broker to send
> a basic.nack. But there is very little value in handling basic.nack
> specially because the integrity of a broker that ever did send a
> basic.nack would probably be compromised.
> 
> 
> -Emile
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss