[rabbitmq-discuss] 3.1.1 High watermark permanent blocking
simon at rabbitmq.com
Thu Jun 13 10:43:22 BST 2013
Presumably when the server is permanently blocked the memory use
actually *is* over the high watermark, right? (Just wanted to check
since I don't think you explicitly said that).
In that case, what does RabbitMQ say the memory is used by? Please see
http://www.rabbitmq.com/memory-use.html for how to get it to tell you.
On 12/06/13 21:17, Mark Ward wrote:
> I wanted to follow up with more evidence.
> If I restart the RabbitMQ 3.1.1 instance while my clients are connected.
> Once the server is back online my clients will resume sending and the test
> will complete the test with success. My clients implement a reconnect when
> connections are lost.
> When the server enters the locked state the clients do not report any
> connection failures or other errors. The server restart eliminates the
> memory high watermark. All data makes it from the publisher to the
> subscriber. Messages that might were on the server are persisted and resume
> This is also a repeatable test.
> View this message in context: http://rabbitmq.1065348.n5.nabble.com/3-1-1-High-watermark-permanent-blocking-tp27358p27360.html
> Sent from the RabbitMQ mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss