[rabbitmq-discuss] Porting .NET client to WinRT API (Windows 8).

Nathan Brown nathan at nkbrown.us
Sat Jul 20 21:10:27 BST 2013

Hi Michael,

Since "depreciate1_1" was mostly about moving away from non-generic types
there's not a lot to add.

One thing I thought of was since then is that because most of the
dictionaries are <string, object> configuration parameters and ASP.Net MVC
has a similar case and they use a RouteValueDictionary type which has a
constructor that can build the dictionary from anonymous types (
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc680272.aspx).  That might be
handy to add if passing configurations through dictionaries is common in
user code.


On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Michael Klishin <mklishin at gopivotal.com>wrote:

> Nathan Brown:
> > I've submitted the contributor agreement, and I hope the submitted
> changes can now be reviewed and considered for main-line inclusion.
> >
> > Emile mentioned that this is now under "bug25552", should I re-base my
> code to the most recent .net client release and set the branch name to
> match?
> Nathan,
> I'm looking into bug25552. Is there anything else you'd like to add to the
> depreciate1_1
> branch?
> Thanks,
> --
> MK
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130720/f137c0a1/attachment.htm>

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list