<div dir="ltr">Hi Michael,<div><br></div><div>Since "depreciate1_1" was mostly about moving away from non-generic types there's not a lot to add.</div><div><br></div><div>One thing I thought of was since then is that because most of the dictionaries are <string, object> configuration parameters and ASP.Net MVC has a similar case and they use a RouteValueDictionary type which has a constructor that can build the dictionary from anonymous types (<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc680272.aspx">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc680272.aspx</a>). That might be handy to add if passing configurations through dictionaries is common in user code.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Nathan</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Michael Klishin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mklishin@gopivotal.com" target="_blank">mklishin@gopivotal.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Nathan Brown:<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> I've submitted the contributor agreement, and I hope the submitted changes can now be reviewed and considered for main-line inclusion.<br>
><br>
> Emile mentioned that this is now under "bug25552", should I re-base my code to the most recent .net client release and set the branch name to match?<br>
<br>
</div>Nathan,<br>
<br>
I'm looking into bug25552. Is there anything else you'd like to add to the depreciate1_1<br>
branch?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
--<br>
MK<br>
<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com">rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>