[rabbitmq-discuss] Cluster capability?

[Michael Klishin]

2013/12/22 Paul Bell <arachweb at gmail.com>

> I was looking at http://www.rabbitmq.com/shovel.html when your post
> appeared. The language on that page speaks in terms of source and
> destination brokers. Does this mean that Shovel is one way? Put otherwise,
> if Cluster 1 is source and Cluster 2 destination, can Cluster 2 also act as
> source; or would such a configuration/use require 2 Shovels, one for each
> direction?
>

I believe it can but if you are looking for more sophisticated replication
setups,
take a look at federated exchanges:

http://www.rabbitmq.com/federated-exchanges.html

(note the max-hops setting)
-- 
MK

http://github.com/michaelklishin
http://twitter.com/michaelklishin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20131222/71231569/attachment.html>