<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2013/12/22 Paul Bell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:arachweb@gmail.com" target="_blank">arachweb@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div>I was looking at <a href="http://www.rabbitmq.com/shovel.html" target="_blank">http://www.rabbitmq.com/shovel.html</a> when your post appeared. The language on that page speaks in terms of source and destination brokers. Does this mean that Shovel is one way? Put otherwise, if Cluster 1 is source and Cluster 2 destination, can Cluster 2 also act as source; or would such a configuration/use require 2 Shovels, one for each direction?</div>

</blockquote></div><br>I believe it can but if you are looking for more sophisticated replication setups,</div><div class="gmail_extra">take a look at federated exchanges:</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">

<a href="http://www.rabbitmq.com/federated-exchanges.html">http://www.rabbitmq.com/federated-exchanges.html</a></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">(note the max-hops setting)<br>-- <br>MK<br>

<br><a href="http://github.com/michaelklishin" target="_blank">http://github.com/michaelklishin</a><br><a href="http://twitter.com/michaelklishin" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/michaelklishin</a><br>
</div></div>