[rabbitmq-discuss] Federated Cluster Issue

Thu Apr 25 17:30:56 BST 2013

Simon,

Thank you so much for pointing out the error I made. I think the issue came
down to my lack of understanding on how the expressions are structured
(don't know very much about regular expressions). I had been thinking that
a pattern like " ^this\. " would cover everything that had "this" in it
(e.g. thisthat.andtheother). Yet another thing I need to brush up on. =]

The links now are sitting in a perpetual "starting" state so I may have
another issue to deal with as well. I will try to troubleshoot that and
post back if I hit any walls. Thank you.

Regards,

Richard

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:

> Thanks. In the cases where you've defined a federation policy its pattern
> is defined as "^expense\.", but the exchanges are named like
> "expensepay.topic". I suspect you want to change the pattern to
> "^expensepay\.".
>
> Cheers, Simon
>
>
> On 24/04/13 23:56, Richard Raseley wrote:
>
>> Simon,
>>
>> I will go ahead and send you the requested output directly. Thank you.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com
>> <mailto:simon at rabbitmq.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi. I mainly just wanted to check the policies against the exchanges
>>     - so the lists of all policies and all exchanges should be enough.
>>     Also feel free to excise anything you think is sensitive and send it
>>     privately.
>>
>>     Cheers, Simon
>>
>>
>>     On 23/04/13 20:16, Richard Raseley wrote:
>>
>>         Simon,
>>
>>         I did not include the leading and trailing spaces when entering
>> the
>>         pattern in the management UI - just did it here for readability
>>         purposes.
>>
>>         I have the output of "rabbitmqctl report" from the 4 nodes in
>>         question
>>         (two per cluster) - were there specific items that you wanted to
>>         look at
>>         (I'd rather not share the entire output for security reasons)? I
>>         can see
>>         that for the vhosts in question it is listing the federate-me
>> policy
>>         (not sure if that is what you were looking for).
>>
>>         Regards,
>>
>>         Richard
>>
>>
>>         On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Simon MacMullen
>>         <simon at rabbitmq.com <mailto:simon at rabbitmq.com>
>>         <mailto:simon at rabbitmq.com <mailto:simon at rabbitmq.com>>> wrote:
>>
>>              On 23/04/13 15:28, Richard Raseley wrote:
>>
>>                  Simon,
>>
>>                  Thank you for your reply.
>>
>>                  1) I was trying to obfuscate my actual naming
>>         conventions - but
>>                  they are
>>                  named in a similar manner. The general structure though
>>         is that in
>>                  cluster01 I have an exchange named something like
>>                  "cluster01.topic" and
>>                  in the pattern field I put " ^cluster01\. " (basically
>>         everything in
>>                  preceeding the "." in the exchange name). Can you
>>         confirm that this
>>                  would be the correct pattern?
>>
>>
>>              In the quotation marks you have leading and trailing spaces
>>         which
>>              would obviously stop the match from working. But other than
>>         that it
>>              looks fine.
>>
>>
>>                  2) I do not see "federate-me" show up in the management
>> UI
>>                  exchange list
>>                  - but I see the policy in the Admin section. Would it
>>         show up as a
>>                  discrete exchange itself?
>>
>>
>>              Some federation-related infrastructure (including
>>         exchanges) would
>>              show up once federation starts, but if you don't see
>>         "federate-me"
>>              in the policy column for any exchange then the policy is not
>>              matching and nothing will happen.
>>
>>              If you can post the results of "rabbitmqctl report" then I
>>         can look
>>              at why the policy pattern is not matching.
>>
>>
>>              Cheers, Simon
>>
>>              --
>>              Simon MacMullen
>>              RabbitMQ, VMware
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     --
>>     Simon MacMullen
>>     RabbitMQ, VMware
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Simon MacMullen
> RabbitMQ, VMware
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130425/51aef750/attachment.htm>